Boardroom – FocalShift

Maven adds this one: every other tool here does what you decide — this is the one that argues with you first.

The Boardroom

A question you cannot settle on your own, put to a room of advisors who do not all agree.

You put the questionOne decision, written the way you would say it out loud, and the advisors you want sitting on it. Maven takes the chair.

They argue it outEach advisor puts its case in its own voice — the marketer, the researcher, the problem solver — arguing from the business you have already described to Maven rather than from a template. They contradict each other, and that is the point of a board.

A summary, then motionsMaven says which argument it thinks holds and why, and the room ends in a short list of things to do. Each one is yours to approve or reject, and the whole meeting stays where you can read it back.

A board pack open on one decision: labelled board pack, headed with the question itself — whether the fractional ops retainer should move to a three-month minimum. Under it the advisors take the question in turn, each behind a coloured monogram, named with the job they hold. Maverick, the chief marketing officer, argues for leaving it alone: month-to-month is the reason the retainer converts, a minimum would only lose the clients who were never going to renew, and if it changes the page has to say why. Scout, research and intelligence, argues the other way with the account’s own history — retainers that ended early, ended before the first documented deliverable landed, and comparable operators in the same city quote longer as standard. Patch, the problem solver, says both of them are answering the wrong question: the term is not the problem, the first month feeling like nothing is, and the fix is to ship something small early and try the minimum on new clients only. Beneath them, under a gavel, Maven’s summary in its own tinted panel: the panel does not agree, here is which argument holds and why, here is what I recommend, and here is when to look at it again. The panel runs on past the foot of the frame, where the motions the meeting ended in are waiting.

View platform screenshots

Read more about The Boardroom

You cannot argue a decision out with yourself. This is a room that will.

You write the decision the way you would say it out loud — should this change, is this worth doing, which of these two — and pick which of Maven’s specialists sit on it. Maven always chairs.

Then they put their cases. The marketer, the researcher and the problem solver each answer in their own voice, out of the business you have already described to Maven, and they disagree with each other in plain words. That disagreement is the thing a single answer cannot give you: one of them will be arguing the position you were quietly avoiding.

Maven sums up as a chair does. It says which argument it thinks holds, names the one that changed its mind, and recommends something narrower than any single advisor asked for — then tells you when it would be worth looking at again.

And the room ends in motions rather than in a wall of prose. Each is one thing to do, written plainly, marked either as advice or as work that belongs to a named part of the product, and waiting on your approve or your reject. Nothing moves because a room of advisors thought it should.

The meeting is kept. It reopens with the cases, the summary and what you decided still on it, so a call you made in August is still explicable in November.

What it actually does